Back

Ripple CTO Says Lack of Smart Contracts Is Good for XRPL but Admits Ethereum Was Wildly Successful

Ripple CTO David Schwartz has shared why XRPL does not have smart contracts and explained the benefits and drawbacks of this compared to Ethereum

article image
Cover image via stock.adobe.com

In a recent series of tweets, Ripple’s David Schwartz shared a story in which he explained why XRPL blockchain creators chose not to implement smart contracts on their ledger, unlike Ethereum, and what the pros and cons of this decision were.

What XRPL lost without smart contracts compared to Ethereum

Ripple CTO David Schwartz tweeted that in today’s episode of Ripple’s "Block Stars" podcast, he and another XRPL developer (and Coil CEO) Stefan Thomas, among others, discussed why they did not introduce smart contracts on the XRP ledger in the first place, while Ethereum chose to do so.

Schwartz admitted that he and the other XRPL devs, including Thomas, decided against smart contracts and proved to be both right and wrong about it.

Ads
Ads

To show why XRPL is better off without smart contracts, he took Ethereum as an example.

Smart contracts, Schwartz stated, make a platform worse for conducting payments. Besides, the Ripple CTO said, they infect their blockchain with fee rates jumping up and down, creating problems with performance and generating many weak points for attackers to exploit.

We were right that adding smart contracts makes a platform worse for payments. And we were right that it would introduce fee instability, performance issues, and have lots of attack surface.

All of these cons are the things that Ethereum has recently been actively criticized for. But XRPL does not have those same issues. Still, Schwartz admitted that Ethereum also gained from introducing smart contracts.

XRP
Image via Twitter

👉 MUST READ Ethereum-Based Blockchain Betting Platform, Augur, Introduces Version 2related article image

"Ethereum was wildly successful"

The Ripple CTO admitted that, despite the above issues, Ethereum "was wildly successful and for good reasons." He added that Ethereum "worked as a public blockchain with built-in smart contracts."

I think I mostly mean technically successful. That is, it worked as a public blockchain with built-in smart contracts, even though it made a lot of choices we thought were technically bad.

Schwartz pointed to certain limitations that restrict the work of smart contracts on Ethereum or make it more complex.

However, he then added that "there are still a lot of useful things Ethereum smart contracts can do despite those limitations."

While Ripple uses XRP ledger to help banks move liquidity and also conduct crypto payments, Ethereum was not meant to be a payment system. But it became a starting point for the majority of other blockchains with native coins, including such giants as Tron, EOS and Binance.

The fastest way to get crypto news is to follow our Twitter. You won’t miss a thing! Subscribe.

article writer image
Yuri Molchan

Yuri entered the crypto sphere at the BTC price peak in 2017, quickly turning into a crypto enthusiast. He has written for several media, covering everything from TA to ICOs and crypto regulations. Presently is a news writer, working with crypto and blockchain-related topics.