Former Governor of Reserve Bank of India Voices His Concerns About Central Bank Digital Currencies

Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) come with data concerns, according to the former governor of the Reserve Bank of India

article image
Cover image via

On the latest episode of the "Beyond the Valley" podcast, Indian economist Raghuram Rajan, who was the 23rd Governor of the Reserve Bank of India, voiced his concerns regarding privacy issues involved in central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

Rajan notes that they come with a lot of personal data, which leads to obvious questions about whether central banks and governments should be trusted with it:

Do you trust the central bank as much with details on every transaction you make? Should the government know? The beauty of the cash in our hands, is that it’s anonymous. Even if you’re not doing something illegal you don’t want the government seeing everything you do.

The disintermediation of banks

Unlike popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, CBDCs, as the name suggests, are issued directly by central banks.

Rajan explains that there are two types of digital CBDCs: "hybrid" (or "indirect") ones that are issued by central banks thorough other banking institutions and centralized ones that are issued directly to consumers.

Central banks
Image by ledgity

The disintermediation of the banking system is also a major concern for CBDCs as major countries rush to adopt them. The ability of commercial banks to issue deposits will become "more fragile."

However, he also notes that China's much-awaited DCEP, which is already leading the race to digitalization, will opt for the hybrid approach.

👉 MUST READ Libra Association Accused of Plagiarizing Crypto Project by MIT Fellowrelated article image

Bitcoin and Libra

The economist claims that Bitcoin has value because everyone thinks it has value.

Speaking of Libra, Facebook's controversial stablecoin that ruffled the feathers of a myriad of politicians and regulators around the globe back in 2019, Rajan says that its value will be preserved by central banks:

On the other hand, Libra is an attempt to create a currency, which is used for transacting. And that, the whole idea is not to hold it as a speculative asset which increases in value...but use it for transactions. So the ultimate underlying value is going to be from the central banks, they're going to preserve the value, not of Libra but of what Libra can be exchanged into.

He claims that the worry with Libra was in the stablecoin's early forms. Back in April, Libra revamped its design by creating stablecoins backed by different fiat currency instead of creating one synthetic cryptocurrency:

It was very ambitious in what it wanted to do but very vague in what its safety precautions would be, and that worries central bankers tremendously.

In this Telegram channel you’ll find fresh news, interviews, infographics, forecasts & other helpful stuff. Join CryptoComes's channel.

article writer image
Alex Dovbnya

Alex covers all things crypto — from major projects, which are fighting tooth and nail to gain the upper hand in the burgeoning industry, to the latest regulatory trends around the world. He’s a firm believer that Blockchain has the potential to reshape pretty much every business out there, and cryptocurrencies are only a stepping stone to the upcoming decentralized revolution.